Evaluation of EFL Textbooks from Teachers Viewpoints on the Ninth Grade High School Prospect3 Based on Ghorbani’s Checklist

Safoora Sadeghi


The present study aimed to investigate teachers’ attitude towards the third-grade secondary school new English textbook called “Prospects 3”. To this end, 25 teachers from different High schools in Minab took part in the study. The selection of participants was based on convenient sampling. In order to collect relevant data for the study a textbook evaluation checklist formed by Ghorbani which consisted of 42 items about four aspects of textbooks, including: Aims and achievements, Skills, Language Type, and Technical considerations were administered to teachers. The researcher used a mixed method for the study. The data was subjected to analysis through descriptive statistics. Findings indicated that although the book has some strong sides, teachers pointed to major weaknesses in textbook in terms of lack of glossary list, shortage of time to cover the stated objectives and a need to recycling the newly learned vocabularies in subsequent lessons. Finally, the result of the study revealed that with respect to this new formed ELT textbook, teachers had more positive attitudes towards aims and achievements, skills, and technical considerations of the book. The findings also revealed that EFL teachers showed the least positive attitude towards Language type, and this study can be important for EFL teachers and learners in Iran. This finding has important implication for teachers since it makes them more aware of the in-depth evaluation and examination of the textbook they are dealing with.


evaluation, textbook, teachers' attitude, case study

Full Text:



Abdollahi-Guilani, M., Yasin, M. S., & Hua, T. K. (2011). Authenticity of Iranian English textbooks for schools. ELT Journal, 1 (2), 25-30. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ells.v1n2p25/

Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B., & Saeidi, M. (2014). The evaluation of “English Textbook 2” taught in Iranian high schools from teachers’ perspectives. English Language Teaching,7(3), 150.

Aliakbari, M. (2004). The place of culture in the Iranian ELT textbooks in high school level. Paper presented at the 9th Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Namseoul University, Korea.

Dahmardeh, M. (2009). Communicative textbooks: English language textbooks in Iranian secondary school. Linguistik online, 4(9), 45-61. Retrieved from http://www.linguistik- online.com/40_09/dahmardeh.pdf

Dubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course Design. Developing Programs and Materials for Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridg University Press.

Ghorbani, M.R. (2011). Quantification and graphic representation of EFL textbook evaluation results. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 511-520. Retrieved from http://ojs.academypublisher.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/4702/0

Hosseini Fatemi, A., Pishghadam, R., & Heidarian, Z. (2011). Gender delineation in high school and pre-university ELT textbooks: A criterion-oriented approach to text analysis. The Iranian EFL Journal, 7 (3), 32-47. Retrieved http://www.iranian-efl-journal.com/

Hutchinson, T. (1987). What is underneath? An interactive view of the materials evaluation. In L. E. Sheldon (ed.). ELT Textbooks and Materials: Problems in Evaluation and Development. Oxford: Modern English Publications.

Jolly, D. & Bolitho, R. (2011). A framework for materials writing. In B. Tomlinson (ed.,2nd ed.). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kiely, R. (2009). Small answers to the big question: Learning from language programme evaluation. Language Teaching Research, 13(1), 99-116.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs. The four levels

(2nd edn.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Prowse. P. (2011). How writers write: Testimony from authors. In B. Tomlinson, (ed.) Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.151-73.

Razmjoo, S. A. (2007). High schools or private institutes textbooks? Which fulfill communicative language teaching principles in the Iranian context? Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 126-140. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl journal.com/

Talebinezhad, M. R., & Namdar, A. (2011). Discourse markers in High School English textbooks in Iran. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (11), 1590-1602. Retrieved from http://ojs.academypublisher.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/011115901602

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Introduction. In B. Tomlinson, (ed.). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2003). Materials Development for Language Teaching. London: Continuum Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction. In B. Tomlinson, (ed.), Materials

Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. & Masuhara, H. (2010). Published research on materials

development in language learning. In B. Tomlinson, & H. Masuhara, (eds.),

Research for Materials Development in Language Learning. London:


Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for

implementation. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed.). Teaching English as a Second or

Foreign Language: Boston. Heinle and Heinle.

Zohrabi, M., Sabouri, H., & Kheradmand, M. (2014). Comparative study of

Interchange1 and English book1 of Iranian high schools. Education

International Journal of English, 3(2), 95-104.

Zohrabi, M., Sabouri, H., & Behroozian, R. (2012). An evaluation of merits and demerits of Iranian first year high school English textbook. English

Language Teaching, 5(8), 14-22. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research