Differences in Communication Between Native English ‎Speakers and EFL Saudi Female Speakers

Shahad Suhail Madini, Nadia Maroof

Abstract


The main aim of this study was to explore EFL and native speakers' differences in communicating with one another. A total of 5 advanced EFL speakers and 3 native English speakers enrolled in two sets of semi-structured interviews. Two rubrics were used to compare the changes in communication among the two groups. The analysis of the qualitative data revealed that there were significant differences in the intercultural communication between EFL and native speakers. Speaker's style of delivery, self-correction, and the avoidance of long answers were the least influencing factors in determining levels of communication hindrances, while the deficiency of fluency and accuracy, intergroup anxiety, and lack of understanding were significant factors in influencing the communication. These findings had several significant implications for both developing and constructing cross-cultural communication skills training, particularly for multinational organizations, and business studies.


Keywords


communication, native English speakers, EFL ‎Saudi female speakers

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Alfallaj, F. S. S. (2016). Foreigner talk and communication strategies: A socio-linguistic ‎study of interactions with foreigners in Saudi Arabia. Theory and Practice in ‎Language Studies, 6(1), 40-45. Retrieved from: ‎http://dx.doi.org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.17507/tpls.0601.05 ‎

Edward T. Hall. (2016, September 02). Study about Intercultural communication. ‎Retrieved from: https://translit.ie/blog/intercultural-communication/‎

Falk, E. & Lieberman, M. (in press). The neural basis of attitudes, evaluation and ‎behaviour change. Psychology press. Retrieved from: ‎http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/Falk_Lieberman_InPress.pdf ‎

Mason, J. (2002). Linking qualitative and quantitative data analysis. In Analyzing ‎qualitative data (pp. 103-124). Routledge. Retrieved from: ‎https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194943/‎‏

Methods of Delivery (n.d). Retrieved from: ‎‏ ‏https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-‎communications/chapter/methods-of-delivery‏/‏

Oakley, A. (1998). Gender, methodology and people's ways of knowing: Some problems ‎with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32(4), 707-‎‎731. Retrieved from: ‎https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194943/‎

Rahmani, D. (2017, August 22). Apprehension and Anxiety in Communication. Oxford ‎Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved 14 Apr. 2019, from ‎‏ ‏http://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613‎‎.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-414.‎

Schneider, J. D. (2007). Effect of gender-related communication differences and awareness ‎of gender-related communication barriers on communication ‎‏ ‏effectiveness ‎‎(Order No. 3259648). Available from ABI/INFORM Collection. (304722307). ‎Retrieved from: https://search-proquest ‎com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/docview/304722307?accountid=142908- ‎‏ ‏‏ ‏

Yashima, T, Zenuk-Nishide, L & Shimizu, K. (March, 2004). The Influence of Attitudes and ‎Effect on Willingness to Communicate and Second Language Communication. ‎Retrieved form: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1540-‎‎4781.00136‎


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research