Systematic Polysemy in Gĩkũyũ

Florence Gathoni Gachugi, Justine Sikuku, Patrick Kiliku

Abstract


Polysemy is a phenomenon whereby words have multiple distinct yet related senses. These senses are related in a systematic way and form systematic patterns. This paper explores the different systematic patterns of polysemy exhibited by Gĩkũyũ nouns, where these nouns have sets of senses that are related in similar ways. These senses cut across different semantic fields such as plants, animal, people, body parts, and objects, types of food and beverages, events. Some of the senses invoke metaphoric relations.


Keywords


Polysemy, Systematic Patterns, Senses, Gĩkũyũ Nouns

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apresjan, J.D. (1974). Regular Polysemy. Linguistics, 142, 5-32

Copestake, A. & Briscoe, T. (1995). Semi-productive Polysemy and Sense Extension. Journal of Semantics, 12, 15-62

Dirven, R. & Porings, R. (2003). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin:

mouton de Gruyter.

Fauconier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the minds

hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Greenberg, J.H. (1983). Some areal characteristics of African languages. Current Approaches to African Linguistics, 1, 3-21.

Gillon, B.S. (1999). The lexical semantics of English count and mass nouns in the Breadth and

Depth of semantic Lexicons, edited by E. Viegas, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 19-37.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lehrer, A. (2009). Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon cognitive linguistic. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.2.207.

Nunberg, G. (1995). Transfer of Meaning. Journal of Semantic, 12, 109-132

Nunberg, G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions. Polysemy linguistics and polysemy. Retrieved http://ling.umd.edu/~ellenlau/courses/ling869/Nunberg_ 1979 .pdf.

Kilgarif, A. (1995). Inheriting polysemy. In computational lexical semantics, edited by P.Saint-

Dizica and E. Viegas. Cambridge: GIP press. 319-335.

Klein, D.E & Murphy, G.L. (2001). The Representation of Polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language 45:259-282.

Kovesces, Z. & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: developing a cognitive Linguistic view.

Cognitive linguistics 9 (1):37-77.

Leech, G. (1990). Semantics: the study of meaning. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Ostler, N. & Atkins, B. (1992). Predictable meaning shift: Some linguistics properties of lexical implication rules. Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation and Knowledge Representations, 627, 87-100

Radden, G. & Kovesces ,Z (1999). Towards a theory of Metonymy. In Metonymy in language

and thought, edited by K-U panther and G. Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Taylor, J. R. (2002). Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven and R.

Porings (eds), metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 323 - 348), Berlin; New york: Mouton de Gruyter.

Yamanashi, M (1987). Metonymic interpretations and associative process in natural language

in Makoto Nagao (Ed). Language and Intelligence. Proceedings of an international symposium on language and Artificial intelligence. North Holland: Elsevier Publisher (pp.77-86).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research