Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives of English Language Assessment

Zohreh Norozi, Zohreh Salehan, Tahereh Ghasemi


This qualitative study aims to address the current understanding of English Language assessment of both the teachers and students in a private language institute in Sirjan city, Iran. To achieve the purpose of the study, four English language teachers were invited for individual interviews. I addition, nine intermediate and pre-intermediate level students were chosen for two focus group interviews. These interview responses were compared to probe the related understandings and experiences of both the teachers and students.


teachers’ and students’ perspectives, English language, assessment

Full Text:



Alderson, JC, & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: a study of washback. Language Testing, 13(3), 280–297.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(1), 1–25

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the Black box: Raising standards through Classroom Assessment. [ electronic version]. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-147.

Brindley, G. (2001). Language assessment and professional development. Experimenting with Uncertainty: Essays in Honour of Alan Davies, 11, 137–143

Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5–12.

Chappius, S., & Chappius, J. (2008). The best value in formative assessment. Educational Leardership, 65(4), 14-19.

Crooks. J. (2002). Educational Assessment in New Zealand Schools. Assessment in Education, 9(2), 237-253.

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251–272.

Hall, W. A., Long, B., Bermbach, N., Jordan, S., & Patterson, K. (2005). Qualitative teamwork issues and strategies: Coordination through mutual adjustment. Qualitative Health Research, 15(3), 394–410.

Hamid, M.O., & Baldauf, R.B., Jr. (2008). Will CLT bail out the bogged down ELT in Bangladesh? English Today, 24(3), 16–24.

Farhadi, H, & Keramati, H. (2009). Language assessment policy in Iran. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 132–141.

Onwuegbuzie, AJ, Dickinson, WB, Leech, NL, & Zoran, AG (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative evaluation and research methods: Integrating theory and practice. New York: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Razavipour, K., & Rezagah, K. (2018). Language assessment in the new English curriculum in Iran: Managerial, institutional, and professional barriers. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1–18.

Razavipour, K., Riazi, A., & Rashidi, N. (2011). On the interaction of test washback and teacher assessment literacy: The case of Iranian EFL secondary school teachers. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 156.

Taylor, S., J., & Bogdan, R., (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research